People v. Stewart – Case Brief

Criminal Law

Brief

People v. Stewart

Procedural History:

  • Defendant found guilty of both second degree murder and wrongfully permitting a child to be a habitual sufferer.
  • Appealed.
  • Affirmed.

Facts:

  • Mother of an infant under two months of age went on a crack binge for two to three days.
  • During this time she did not feed or care for the child.
  • The child died from dehydration.
  • Mother was charged with second degree felony murder and wrongfully permitting a child to be a habitual sufferer.

Issue:

  • Is wrongfully permitting a child to be a habitual sufferer inherently dangerous to human life?

Holding:

  • Yes. Affirmed.

Reasoning:

  • Court believes the correct approach is for the trier of fact to consider the facts and circumstances of the case to determine if the felony was inherently dangerous.
  • The jury felt that wrongfully permitting a child to be a habitual sufferer was inherently dangerous to human life and thus affirmed the lower court conviction.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
law-blogs.net
Powered by WordPress | iCellPhoneDeals.com has the best cell phone Deals. | Thanks to Upgrade Sprint Phone, MMO Games and Conveyancing