Corporations
Brief
Hayes v. National Service Industries
Procedural History:
- District Court overruled Hayes’ objections, and adopted the report and recommendation of the Judge, agreeing that Rogers had apparent, if not actual authority to settle Hayes’ claim.
- Appealed.
- Affirmed.
Facts:
- Hayes sued National Service Industries alleging wrongful discharge as a sales representative.
- The attorneys for the two sides settled the case.
- Plaintiff then contends that she did not consent to her attorney Rogers settling the case.
- Hayes filed the objections claiming that she did not give Rogers the authority to settle the case on her behalf.
Issue:
- Did the attorney have actual or apparent authority to settle the case on behalf of his client?
Holding:
- Yes.
Reasoning:
- An attorney of record is the clients agent in pursuing a cause of action and under Georgia law, “an act of an agent within the scope of his apparent authority binds the principle.”
- Hayes’ attorney spoke with counsel for Nation and expressly told Morgan that he had authority from Hayes to settle the case for %15,000.
- According to Georgia law, an attorney has the apparent authority to enter into a binding agreement on behalf of a client and such agreement is enforceable against the client.

Posted in
Tags: 

